Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 20090917133544.GE25739@eddie
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:48:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems like there would
> be lots of situations where short exclusive-lock intervals could be
> tolerated, even though not long ones.  So that's another argument
> for being able to set an upper bound on how many tuples get moved
> per call.

Presumably this couldn't easily be an upper bound on the time spent moving
tuples, rather than an upper bound on the number of tuples moved?

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux LSB init script
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: generic copy options