On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:02:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> >> That is a slightly alarmist. Who are we going to lose these
> >> users to?
>
> > Drizzle. MySQL forks. CouchDB. Any database which has
> > replication which you don't need a professional DBA to understand.
> > Whether or not it works.
>
> You haven't explained why we'd lose such folk next year when we
> haven't lost them already. MySQL has had replication (or at least
> has checked off the bullet point ;-)) for years. I'd be seriously
> surprised if any of the forks will offer significantly better
> replication than is there now, so the competitive situation is not
> changing in that regard.
>
> It is true that we're missing a chance to pull some folks away while
> the situation on that side of the fence is so messy. But I don't
> see our situation getting worse because of that, just not getting
> better.
"Not getting better," isn't a situation to be dismissed lightly. In
FLOSS, as I've seen it, a project whose adoption isn't growing is
dying.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
