On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 10:44:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch)
> > is all that is required.
>
> I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as
> such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha
> release corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like
> a kluge;
Right.
> and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might want
> to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug. A
> tag without a branch won't handle that either.
Is this a use case? I truly hope nobody will try using a beta, let
alone an alpha, in production. Do we need to provide for such a
possibility? I don't recall that we've ever back-patched a beta, or
even a release candidate.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
