Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> >
> > Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
> > confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
> > actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
> > anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
> >
>
> yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
> usefulness for maintaining a sf.net project?
I don't know, but as long as it exists we should keep it current. Do we
want to remove it?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
