Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer
Date
Msg-id 20090706102310.GI20436@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer  (Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>)
List pgsql-performance
* Craig Ringer (craig@postnewspapers.com.au) wrote:
> What that does mean, though, is that if you don't have significantly
> more RAM than a 32-bit machine can address (say, 6 to 8 GB), you should
> stick with 32-bit binaries.

I'm not sure this is always true since on the amd64/em64t platforms
you'll get more registers and whatnot in 64-bit mode which can offset
the pointer size increases.

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer