On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 04:30:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I assume the 'type' column will identify triggers, i/o functions
> > (cstring), window functions, and maybe aggregates too; this solves
> > several problems at once.
>
> +1 for all except i/o functions. The cstring check for that was always
> flat-out wrong, and getting it right is far more expensive than it's
> worth --- AFAICS you'd have to grovel through all entries in pg_type.
I'll leave it out :)
> But aggregates are only relevant if we decide to start showing
> aggregates in \df --- is there consensus for that?
I'd throw 'em in.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
