Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date
Msg-id 200903281931.n2SJVHp15381@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce, Simon,
> 
> > I don't think there is an agreed todo item there. We were in the middle
> > of discussing other ideas and this is the wrong time to have a longer
> > debate on the topic. We should not squash other ideas by putting this as
> > a todo item yet.
> 
> I agree.  We don't have consensus on the TODO.   We need to hash it out 
> more after 8.4 goes beta.

OK, I am confused, but item removed.  :-|

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily (I hope) disable flattening of IN/EXISTS sublinks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf