Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't
> > > > have one. I think the false-positives problem is real and might make
> > > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for
> > > > 8.3.
> > >
> > > Huh? What false positive problem?
> >
> > typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are
> > _not_ typedefs.
>
> Does this actually happen anywhere?
No idea; it was more a theoretical issue to say that having more
typedefs is not necessarily a good thing; they should ideally be the
typedefs we use, and Windows adds a lot of typedefs we don't use.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
