Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > 2009/3/24 Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org>:
> >> catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
> >> the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
> >> and possibly a pending list).
>
> > Will this break pg_migrator?
>
> No worse than it's already broken by hash indexes. I would imagine
> the strategy will just be to force a REINDEX on any non-btree indexes.
Agreed.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
