Re: small but useful patches for text search - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: small but useful patches for text search
Date
Msg-id 200903162220.n2GMK4p17220@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: small but useful patches for text search  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: small but useful patches for text search  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > The earlier commitfests were not time-limited either. They lasted until all
> > the patches were dealt with; either committed or bumped to next commit fest.
> > It's just that when you know there still at least one more commitfest a
> > couple of months ahead, everyone feels more happy to bump a patch and to
> > have one's patch bumped to the next one. In the last one, it's a lot harder
> > to do that because that means bumping to the next release, and you don't
> > even know when the next commitfest is.
> >
> > The original plan was that anything not 100% ready to commit at the
> > beginning of the last commit fest will be bumped to the next release, and
> > beta would start right after the first commit fest, a week or two after the
> > submission deadline. We failed to enforce that. In the next release cycle, I
> > think we need to be more explicit about that policy throughout the release
> > cycle and really enforce it.
> 
> I mostly agree with this, but there is one fly in the ointment: if a
> patch really hasn't been seriously looked at by a committer, bumping
> it recreates one of the problems CommitFests were designed to avoid -
> patch limbo.  I feel pretty good about the decisions to postpone Hot
> Standby and SE-PostgreSQL (not that my personal opinion necessarily
> counts for much, but that's how I feel); I would have felt less good
> about it if the same decision had been made a month ago.  But on the
> other hand that means 8.4 will be a month later.  If we could have
> gone through the same process two months earlier, or if we could have
> released 8.4beta and done those reviews on the side during the beta
> period, that would have been best of all.

Well, we have been working on stuff for the past month so it was not
like we were waiting on SE-PG to move forward.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: small but useful patches for text search
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with accesing Oracle from plperlu functionwhen using remote pg client.