Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions
Date
Msg-id 20090305182728.GQ25872@eddie
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I've recently run into a problem with a datatype whose operators are
based on functions not marked IMMUTABLE. Although there might be good
reasons to have such a thing, it seems like it might be a valuable
warning message if you create an operator based on an non-IMMUTABLE
function. Comments?

- Josh / eggyknap

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore -m failing
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions