Re: pg_upgrade project status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date
Msg-id 200901272309.17636.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade project status  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:02:30 Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 21:36:01 Dave Page wrote:
> >> If it's been around for a year, why hasn't it been
> >> submitted long ago so we could have rewritten and reviewed etc. in
> >> plenty of time?
> >
> > It's in the commit fest listing, and the discussion about which
> > programming language to port it to happened weeks ago.
>
> It was added to the commitfest page on December 5th, and links to an
> email from the day before. The only discussion on the language I can
> see in the linked thread is David Fetter offering to rewrite the code
> in perl.

Well, the is ultimately about the same discussion we are having now, except 
that people are a lot more excited when you threaten to cancel the 
project. ;-)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning