Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date
Msg-id 200901081744.n08Hixn01494@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql  ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>)
Responses Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:08:06 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Right, so Tom says it isn't 100% ReST:
> > 
> >     http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01310.php
> 
> Right but did you see the followup?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01319.php

Yes, I did, and now I see why you said there might be only a few broken
cases.  But I did not see any documentation in the standard saying that
was OK:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#escaping

so it might be that your ReST interpreter is broken.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql