Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: dblink vs SQL/MED
Date
Msg-id 200812291440.57062.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to dblink vs SQL/MED  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: dblink vs SQL/MED  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 20 December 2008 19:33:17 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
> >
> > This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
> > like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
> > managing their connection information.
>
> It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
> distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
> Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?

Martin had sent some code for that with his original patch series.  I or 
someone can review that next.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Gcc 4.4 causes abort in plpython.
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: About CMake (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major)