dblink vs SQL/MED - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject dblink vs SQL/MED
Date
Msg-id 19199.1229794397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: dblink vs SQL/MED  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Re: dblink vs SQL/MED  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter wrote:
> SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
> 
> This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
> like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
> managing their connection information.

It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink vs SQL/MED