Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date
Msg-id 200812162258.16948.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Monday 15 December 2008 23:56:08 Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC.  They're not the same benchmark.
>
> Agreed.  Somewhere earlier in the thread I mentioned that the OSDL
> kits are non-spec-compliant, a little buggy, and sometimes give better
> results than the real tests.

Could we consolidate everyone's concerns into a project outline, if one is
necessary?

- Everyone would like to have a TPC-like benchmark kit.
- OSDL script are not compliant.
- OSDL scripts are outdated/appear unmaintained.
- OSDL scripts need POstgreSQL-specific improvements.
- EnterpriseDB is apparently maintaining their own fork.

What can we do?

I found the TPC-C spec on the web, so it's freely available for
implementation, it appears.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Selena Deckelmann"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle