Well
but the RFC's were in fact prior to thunderbird
So for he most of its life, when few people was using it,
Thiunderbird was a sad example of your botched attempt of creating a
standar of NOT FOLLOWING THE RFC's...
Well, also M$ thought they invented internet so its a common mistake.
May be you can push Thunderbird guys a bit to include a little more funcionailty
other than complaining others that try to follow what to seemed to be the right way.
Are we going to try be standars compliant or we keep trying to reinvent the wheel?
Poor RFC people, what a waste of time...
Regards, Angel
El Jueves 23 Octubre 2008 Collin Kidder escribió:
> Angel Alvarez wrote:
> > What's such most advanced mail reader??
> >
> > No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
> > By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, reply to list)
> > in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message.
> >
> > in fact many other mail-list dont have such extended features, as not all of the
> > previous 4 options works as expected. For me this makes postgres lists the most
> > complete about the RFC.
> >
> > So is about, thunderbird to move forward one step, not to cripple standars back.
> > In fact this remembers me the M$ way of doing things..
> >
> > Regards, Angel
> >
> >
> >
>
> One could argue that a standard which is respected by nobody but a few
> people from this list is NOT a standard but rather a botched attempt at
> creating a standard which no one wanted.
>
--
Ningún personajillo ha sido vilipendiado si no es necesario. El 'buen rollo' está en nuestras manos.
->>-----------------------------------------------
Clist UAH a.k.a Angel
---------------------------------[www.uah.es]-<<--
"BIG BANG: átomo primigenio que, debido a una incorrecta manipulación por parte de Dios, explotó y provocó una tremenda
algaradaen el vacío, razón por la que, aún hoy, las empresas aseguradoras no quieren ni oír hablar de Dios."
