Robert Haas wrote:
> > The objection comes down to this: it's an extremely large, invasive,
> > and probably performance-losing patch, which apparently will be of use
> > to only a rather small set of people. It's not unreasonable to discuss
> > just how large that set might be while we debate whether to accept the
> > patch.
>
> Significant loss of performance for people who are not using the
> feature seems like it ought to be considered a non-starter. "Not
> using MAC" needs to be a fast-path.
Right now all of SE-PostgreSQL is a compile-time option so I assume the
slowdown is only for compile-enabled builds.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
