On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:15:32 David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:12:54PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:03 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > >> No, it's been changed back. We don't hand out sysop/root privs to
> > >> anyone without good and justified reason.
> > >
> > > Slow down, there, cowboy. I'm trying to put up some of the SQL
> > > standard, and the usual markup won't work, as it involves lists nested
> > > 3 deep. How about reverting it again and not assuming I'm out to
> > > destroy the site? I've got plenty of accesses a lot more privileged
> > > than that, and I stand on my track record with same.
> >
> > With respect, that's not the point. I'm sure you agree that privileges
> > on any system should only be given where they are justified, otherwise
> > the security of the system can easily go to pot.
> >
> > On http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/User:Dpage I have lists going 4
> > levels deep with no problem. Please give an example of what doesn't
> > work for you.
>
> Very simple. The standard doesn't number them the way you're doing,
> and I need to be able to override it. Just to clarify, if somebody
> doesn't use actual HTML and the given classes for <li> tags, nothing
> will change.
>
Isn't the right way to override css to use an inline style?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
