Re: Noisy CVS updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Subject Re: Noisy CVS updates
Date
Msg-id 20080907084451.dace9e3e.darcy@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Noisy CVS updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Noisy CVS updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Noisy CVS updates  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Re: Noisy CVS updates  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:39:39 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> writes:
> > ...etc.  Would it be OK if I went in and added .cvsignore files to keep
> > the noise level down?
> 
> Uh, no, at least not before you've explained why you get those messages
> and others don't.

I didn't know that I am the only one.  Am I?

> (Personally, I never do "cvs update" without "make distclean" first;
> there are too many other ways to get screwed by updating a live build
> tree.)

I assume that you are talking about conflicts.  In fact, that's one of
the main reasons for wanting a quiet update so that I can catch those
right away when I am working on some files.  I do an automatic update
daily to keep current with the head. I don't do a "make distclean"
first because I may be working on something and I want to keep the
changes in the tree to try stuff and report patches against HEAD.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dmitry Koterov"
Date:
Subject: Re: Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing statistics write overhead