Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date
Msg-id 200808191834.m7JIYl202518@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > Do I think it should be pushed back to 8.3.x; no. It is a feature. I
> > > don't consider the existing behavior a bug. I consider it a
> > > limitation and we don't back patch fixes for limitations. 
> > 
> > The bottom line here is that we don't have the time to explain or
> > justify our backpatch policy every time someone shows up with a bug
> > that needs to be fixed.
> 
> Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in
> developer FAQ.

Seems we need to add it.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjusting debug_print_plan to be more useful by default
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjusting debug_print_plan to be more useful by default