Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Drake
Subject Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 20080819103038.07593d21@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:22:34 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm really not in favor of having comments in the conf file that try
> to tell you about stuff you might want to set, much less why.  That
> task properly belongs to some kind of introductory chapter in the
> SGML docs. Novice DBAs are unlikely even to *find* the config file,
> let alone look inside it, if there's not an introductory chapter
> telling them about Things They Ought To Do.

I would be willing to work up a patch that does as you suggest.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Next
From: "Asko Oja"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures