On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:43:11AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> daveg <daveg@sonic.net> writes:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:50:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> In most cases our policy has been that pg_dumpall should accept and pass
> >> through any pg_dump option for which it's sensible to do so. I did not
> >> make that happen but it seems it'd be a reasonable follow-on patch.
>
> > I'll remember that next time.
>
> Er .. actually that was a direct request for you to do it.
Attached is a the followon patch for pg_dumpall and docs to match pg_dump.
On a second topic, is anyone working on a parallel dump/load? I'd be
interested in helping.
-dg
--
David Gould daveg@sonic.net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.
