Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Date
Msg-id 20080513221448.44d48477@mha-laptop.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Silently not locking is surely
> >> not very safe.
> >>
> >
> > Here is the dump code version of the patch.  If anyone wants the
> > return value idea, let me know.
>
> So is this a patch we want applied?

Please see my other thread about libpq thread-locking which should be
finished before this one, after which this patch will change. So no,
this is not the version to be applied.

//Magnus

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch