Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Silently not locking is surely
> > >> not very safe.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the
> > > return value idea, let me know.
> >
> > So is this a patch we want applied?
>
> Please see my other thread about libpq thread-locking which should be
> finished before this one, after which this patch will change. So no,
> this is not the version to be applied.
Hmm, AFAICT on that other thread you state
> I'm leaning towards going with the simpler one, which is the patch
> from Andrew that crashes on out of memory.
which would seem to mean this patch?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
