Am Montag, 21. April 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> That sounds like a pretty bad idea, since it would treat ordering
> differences as insignificant even when they aren't --- for example,
> an ordering difference in the output of a query that *has* an
> ORDER BY is usually a bug.
Well, we wouldn't treat ordering differences as OK, but we could print
foo ... FAILED (only ordering differences)
which might give a clue.
Then again, the effort to make this bulletproof might be more than continuing
to field the occasional question about the issue.
