Re: Concurrent psql patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date
Msg-id 200804090226.m392QbO14282@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Are you suggesting we just delete the threads and let them die if they
> > don't submit a new version?
> >
> >
>
> My understanding was that all items in a commit-fest have one of these
> three dispositions:
>
> . committed
> . rejected
> . referred back to author for more work
>
> We're really only interested in the third one here, and so, yes, the
> ball should be in the author's court, not yours. I don't see any reason
> for you to move items from one queue to another like that. It just looks
> like it's making work.

True.  I could move the emails back to my private mailbox and just track
them there too.  I moved them so it would be visible we were waiting for
some people.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Partial match in GIN