On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:34:44PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But is it OK to add a function to the library without bumping the
> version? AFAICS all you have reverted is the version bump, so we could
With most people refering to ecpg 8.3.1 (for instance) anyway I think
the risk is rather small.
> have two versions of the library with the same version number, one with
> the new function and one without - that seems somewhat undesirable.
It is indeed.
> Also, regardless of the safety or otherwise, isn't it our standard
> practice not to change anything in stable releases except for bug fixes?
> That's part of what makes Postgres so stable, in fact.
I still fail to see how this added function could pose a problem. It
does, however, fix a bug - make that a missing, undocumenterd feature -
that causes the aubit application to break.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
