Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date
Msg-id 200803210330.m2L3U1T28529@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
List pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Chris Hoover wrote:
> >> If you have any real life good or bad stories, I'd love to hear it.  Given
> >> the NetApp arrays supposedly being very good NFS platforms, overall, is this
> >> a recommended way to run PostgreSQL, or is it recommended to not run this
> >> way.
>
> > We do have an NFS section in our documentation at the bottom of this
> > page:
> >     http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/creating-cluster.html
>
> Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
> to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
> Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.  Joe Conway
> can still show you the scars from learning that lesson, I believe.
> See the archives...

Do the docs need updating for this?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS