Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on
> >>> search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there
> >>> perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If
> >>> that's all we need, we could easily have an url like
> >>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?msgid=19873987123@foo.com redirect
> >>> to the proper page on archives?
> >> Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link
> >> to that easily.
> >
> > I would very much like such a URL as well. At a guess it would require hacking
> > the tsearch parser we use for the search engine on the web site?
>
> No, it requires hacking the indexing script, and we'll store the
> messageid in it's own column in the table.
Yea, it would be nice if we could do it.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
