Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date
Msg-id 20080317142121.GC4317@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
List pgsql-patches
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> Before we go any further, is this work derived from SELinux?  If so, is
>> it covered under the GPL?  If so, can it be licensed under BSD terms?
>
> All of SE-PostgreSQL works are licensed unser BSD terms.
> We are considering to push SE-PostgreSQL into upstreamed PostgreSQL from
> the beginning, and we understand to choose GPL makes it impossible.

Right.  The question is: since this is derived from SE-Linux, is it
affected by SE-Linux license?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches