Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly
Date
Msg-id 20080314164151.GL4843@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:

> > That's really, really ugly.  I'd rather see the flag passed down to
> > vacuum_rel as a regular function argument.  I realize you'll need
> > to touch the signatures of a couple of levels of functions to do that,
> > but a global variable for this seems just dangerous.
>
> Okay, I'll do that instead.

Does this look better?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly