-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:16:33 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> As you may have noticed
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-03/msg00470.php) we
> now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing techdocs
> which unfortunately never worked quite as we had hoped in it's current
> form.
>
> It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site
> has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with
> the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer
> wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already
> over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki
> into a dedicated area on it.
>
> Any thoughts on whether thats a good or bad idea? Any objections?
Not an objection but an observation. The developer wiki seems to be a
catchall for contributors to put various stuff on. There is patch
status, advocacy policies, release policies etc...
Based on your description of wiki.postgresql.org it is supposed to be
a replacement for techdocs.
To me, they have different purposes.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of
Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2BIhATb/zqfZUUQRAr/WAJ9ffj8pvozqRAwALu+nxjOlSw5bkACfdQcH
ikknupDqWY/0B3MhcAXhscQ=
=E1Cf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
