On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Applied with minor corrections.
>
>> Why is this not the default when supported?
>
> Fear.
>
> Maybe eventually, but right now I think it's too risky.
>
> One point that I already found out the hard way is that sizeof(off_t) = 8
> does not guarantee the availability of largefile support; there can also
> be filesystem-level constraints, and perhaps other things we know not of
> at this point.
>
Just to note an additional filesystem that will need special action...
The VxFS filesystem has a largefiles option, per filesystem. At least that
was the case on SCO UnixWare (No, I no longer run it).
LER
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
