-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:30:19 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> I don't expect this to be resolved today or tomorrow but doing things
> the wrong way for the sake of expediency isn't helpful either.
JoshB asked me to post this:
(02:41:47 PM) linuxpoet: YOu basically want to rush through a bunch of
changes, that are wrong in the first place, for expediency sake
(02:41:49 PM) linuxpoet: there is no reason for it
(02:42:12 PM) agliodbs: so, you're in favor of delaying an update to
the contributor listings for weeks or months while we work out a new
policy?
(02:42:27 PM) agliodbs: just to be clear
(02:42:49 PM) linuxpoet: I would rather do it correctly, than do what
you suggest. Yes.
(02:43:04 PM) linuxpoet: That means communication, transperancy, and a
plan
(02:43:12 PM) linuxpoet: which includes documentation and understanding
of the purpose of the list
(02:43:21 PM) agliodbs: and in the meantime, nothing gets updated,
correct?
(02:43:31 PM) linuxpoet: It isn't like that is a change :P
(02:43:50 PM) agliodbs: mind posting that viewpoint on a list?
(02:43:56 PM) linuxpoet: I thought I had but sure
(02:44:00 PM) agliodbs: I think it's liable to be controversial
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH1azpATb/zqfZUUQRAkpgAJ9zJbKGlqvB4s9uzOTF7HPxvQhGSwCgli6E
7eWWR+DLTNJgotblTbOb84Q=
=jLgm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
