-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:11:54 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:47:51 +0100
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
>
> > > [1] The contributor label will be removed in favor of groups or
> > > teams.
> >
> > hmm interesting idea - what happens to the current "code
> > contributor" section here in that new scheme ("code team"?) ?
>
> Actually I assumed hackers, which in term would be determined by those
> who submit patches to core. However, I didn't want to be presumptuous
> as I am not a hacker. Note that I do think we should stick with the
> idea that committer rights are not relevant here.
>
In thinking about this I might have an additional solution:
A hacker is someone who:
In the last 24 months has contributed -n- number of patches or a patch
of significant value to the project.
Obviously we get into some subjective ideas here, what is a significant
value to the project? HOT and Tsearch2 come to mind and I think that
under no circumstances should we not provide examples.
In all, this is certainly not a perfect solution but there is no such
thing in the first place.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH1X+7ATb/zqfZUUQRApkrAJ9LGWuhXfRVGf31Kz2RMT8raK5RQwCgiAZ3
/4X3/p8BPhLp1g+0s0nPYcg=
=YZug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
