On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:25:00 -0800
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> It's good to explain why PG does what it does how it does it, and that
> should be in that section of the FAQ, but continuing, even by silence,
> with an answer equivalent to, "We don't do that. You shouldn't
> either. Tough $#!+" only makes us look bad, where suggesting
> alternatives for the use cases we don't cover makes us look good.
I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
that sentiment.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> David.
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
