I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can hurt later down the road. It is pretty
obviousthat amost every current system has options to convert from or to mirror a CVS repository. But what if we
somedayreally want to use something else as the master repository? Are we ready to accept losing unsupported mirrors at
thattime, or will that actually influence the choice (I think that it should not ... but I can hear the outcry
already).
Jan
--
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subj: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date: Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:15
Size: 773 bytes
To: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>
cc: "Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 schrieb Brendan Jurd:
> In particular, if the git repos were officially supported, and best
> practises for use with Postgres documented, I think a lot more hackers
> would be comfortable using git to do their work, which is good for
> collaboration (as mentioned by Greg Stark and Heikki upthread).
Well, I didn't want to announce anything before anything existed, but this is
precisely what is being worked on. Watch for an announcement in this forum.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's
datatypesdo not match
