Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date
Msg-id 20080206155952.080a998b@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:50:34 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I've read some developers appreciating the way review board works:
> >   http://review-board.org/
> >   http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
> >   http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/UserBasics
>
> Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it
> says is that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN.  The

O.k. I am not too interested in starting a whole war here (again) but
for the record, we have what appears to be a perfectly working
capability to move from cvs to svn. So *if* review board is something
we really like, the SCM should not be the barrier.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations