-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:26:03 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Without the gateway, we'd end up with two separate on-line
> >> communities for Postgres. Doesn't sound like a good idea.
>
> > I doubt that there is a significant number of users on usenet for
> > PostgreSQL.
>
> You're very mistaken, sir. I know because I routinely get email from
> people who are using usenet to read the lists. (I can tell because
routinely does not equate to significant number of users, which was my
point.
> instead of a cc: to the list, there's a Newsgroup: header. It's
> fairly obvious to me because when I reply, I find I have to create a
> cc: manually.) One example of a fairly well-known contributor who
> does it that way is the guy who posts as Andrew @ Supernews ... you
> want to cut him off?
Of course not but I wonder...
<linuxpoet> AndrewSN: ping
<AndrewSN> linuxpoet: pong
<AndrewSN> linuxpoet: what, you mean if the nntp gateway was down?
<linuxpoet> right
<AndrewSN> linuxpoet: no, I probably wouldn't
<linuxpoet> sigh
Well obviously that confirms it. So basically we leave the gateway open.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHjkgsATb/zqfZUUQRAgLGAJ96+dNS2VDlP8ox9zY1+yiMmhwRvQCfZYAN
+M4xiGxZCQDnkxiVXMJhxPA=
=tTy9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
