Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date
Msg-id 20080.1151422256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
> send() may take as long as 200ms. So, I think we should increase
> SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.

Why would that help?  We won't be sending more than 8K at a time.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yoshiyuki Asaba
Date:
Subject: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?