Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > So I suggest we swap Just-in-time for Async Commit.
> >
> > I don't necessarily disagree with the priorities, but your changes are kind
> > of untimely. That text was there for over a month of discussion -- it's
> > gone out to the translators already. I'm sorry to be negative when you're
> > trying to help, but I *begged* people to comment and correct in November.
>
> Apologies again.
>
> > So, do you feel that making the change is worth potentially having some of
> > the translated versions be inconsistent because they don't get updated?
>
> In short, Yes.
Yea, I have async commit as the first item the performance section of
the release notes because it is our #1 performance improvment in terms
of new performance capabilities.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
