Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Date
Msg-id 200712170207.lBH27Tv10749@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark wrote:
> 
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> 
> > I'm fairly surprised these queries work. Is there some reason why we
> > support this? April Fools Day? Jules Verne? I'm all for fast queries,
> > but zero seems like the lowest value we should support...
> 
> Huh, I was all set to post an example of a useful application of it but then
> apparently I'm wrong and it doesn't work:
> 
> postgres=# select * from generate_series(1,10) offset -1 limit 2;
>  generate_series 
> -----------------
>                1
>                2
> (2 rows)
> 
> I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to guess what I was expecting.
> 
> So given that that doesn't work I don't see any particular reason to accept
> negative offsets or limits in 8.4 and on.

Since we got LIMIT/OFFSET from MySQL, would someone tell us how MySQL
behaves in these cases?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?