Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lincoln Yeoh
Subject Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date
Msg-id 200711301401.lAUE1X0b021051@smtp1.jaring.my
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  ("Trevor Talbot" <quension@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-general
At 09:09 PM 11/30/2007, Trevor Talbot wrote:

>The controller always exists, so it's not moving a point of failure;
>if a controller goes you've lost the disk anyway.

Anecdotal - I have found "smart" raid controllers to fail more often
than dumb scsi controllers (or even SATA/PATA controllers), and some
seem more failure prone than semi-decent operating systems.

Not recommending people turn fsync off, but the O/S "always" exists,
if it is that flaky, you might lose data anyway, so pick a better O/S.

What's more likely in most places is somebody powering down the
server abruptly, and then fsync=off could hurt :).

Regards,
Link.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shane Ambler
Date:
Subject: Re: 1 cluster on several servers
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql table inheritance