Re: quotas once again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: quotas once again
Date
Msg-id 200711282242.lASMgCS10851@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: quotas once again  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: quotas once again  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: quotas once again  ("Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev@xs4all.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
> 
> this patch was commited
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php

Uh, he was asking about "quotas", not "quotes".  No, we don't have user
quotas yet.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



> 
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule
> 
> On 28/11/2007, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and
> > IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected).
> >
> > Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gevik
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > Gevik Babakhani
> >
> > PostgreSQL NL       http://www.postgresql.nl
> > TrueSoftware BV     http://www.truesoftware.nl
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> >        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: quotas once again
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: quotas once again