Re: Syntax error in a large COPY - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: Syntax error in a large COPY
Date
Msg-id 20071107083115.6f9cc0f6.wmoran@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax error in a large COPY  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Syntax error in a large COPY  (Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com>)
List pgsql-general
In response to Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>:

> Tom Lane, 07.11.2007 06:14:
> > Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> writes:
> >> If everyone simply top-posted, there would be no need for me to scroll down,
> >> just to find a two line answer below a forty line quote - which I personally
> >> find more irritating than top-posting.
> >
> > I think you're ignoring my basic point, which was that people shouldn't
> > be quoting forty lines' worth in the first place.  *Especially* not if
> > they only have two lines to contribute.
>
> No, I did get your point.
>
> My point is: with top-posting I don't care how many lines were repeated
> because I don't have to scroll.

Considering there is an RFC that recommends inline posting over
top-posting (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855), and considering the
fact that this topic has been beat to death on dozens of mailing lists
and the predominant preference is _not_ for top-posting -- perhaps you
should either follow the preferences of the group, or leave the group.

> > But this horse has been beat to death before...

Obviously not, as it keeps coming back to life.  I guess it's an
undead horse?

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Reg Me Please
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql simple query performance question
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax error in a large COPY