Re: Slow regression tests on windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Slow regression tests on windows
Date
Msg-id 20071105160308.GG24416@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow regression tests on windows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Slow regression tests on windows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>From what I can see MinGW regression is somewhat slower than MSVC (and 
> >>even than Cygwin) on my buildfarm VM that runs all three, even though 
> >>the latter two are rate limited by MAX_CONNECTIONS.
> >>    
> >
> >Uh, you're saying MSVC and Cygwin somehow differ from MingW? 
> >
> >
> >  
> 
> I'm saying my buildfarm members differ from each other.

Ah. I thought you meant we had some builtin cap in the regression tests,
which is what confused me.


> In fact, on the last run of each, MinGW was by far the slowest and 
> Cygwin the fastest in the "make check" step. But there could be any 
> number of reasons for that, including extraneous activity on the VM host 
> that could have slowed the whole VM down.

Yeah. It does surprise me a lot that cygwin should be fastest, really.


> Anyway, comparing regression test speeds is probably not very productive.

Agreed.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Clarification about HOT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before