-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:11:30 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Yeah, I'd vote for people just building private PG installations in
> >> their own home directories. I am not aware of any
> >> performance-testing reason why we'd want a shared installation,
> >> and given that people are likely to be testing many different code
> >> variants, a shared
>
> > The only caveat here is that our thinking was that the actual arrays
> > would be able to be re-provisioned all the time. E.g; test with
> > RAID 10 with x stripe size, Software RAID 6, what is the real
> > difference between 28 spindles with RAID 5 versus 10?
>
> Well, we need some workspace that won't go away when that happens.
Right which is on the internal devices.
> I'd suggest that the OS and people's home directories be mounted on
> a "permanent" partition with plenty of space for source code, say a
> few tens of GB, and then there be a farm of data workspace that's
> understood to be transient and can be reconfigured as needed for tests
> like that.
Agreed.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading
> through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command
> to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to
> the mailing list cleanly
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHK5LwATb/zqfZUUQRApBQAJ9Gp+fpgOnA6ZONpdQl43giMcetZwCggv2Q
8A9FfkeP6VsQptWl1J8W4n8=
=nX1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
