Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata
Date
Msg-id 20071102092348.2f5608f1@scratch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata  (Jeff Trout <threshar@torgo.978.org>)
Responses Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:40:46 -0400
Jeff Trout <threshar@threshar.is-a-geek.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
> 
> Asking here since it may deal with clever things such as alignment  
> and or binary reps.
> 
> I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are  
> running x86_64. At first I figured I'd need to dump & load my data,  
> which will be painful.  But on a whim I made a test db on the  
> opteron, copied it over (tar) and it fired up and worked fine on the  
> xeon.  Seeing the success of this, I took our PITR backup and  
> restored it properly, and everything seems to be functioning  
> correctly from my tests.

x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd.

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK08WATb/zqfZUUQRAtRcAKCoh0UqQJCfCbRltsfdqgaoPpa/SACePsRQ
t3/gNGb9/Lus6JaiVj3yhuA=
=6vs/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: minimal update