On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:54:03 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> > I'm not referring to the content - I wouldn't want to suggest
> > stopping anyone making valid criticism. I'm referring to the
> > language which is almost certainly offensive to many.
>
> Hmm. I obviously live in a very different society than you do,
> because I don't know of anybody who'd be offended by "pissed of".
There are two sides to this:
1. Those who will be offended
There is definitely those who will find this offensive. It is
considered a bit of a swear word, albeit not nearly as much as others.
2. Those who will feel it is unprofessional.
I fall into #2 but I can sure as hell understand why PostgreSQL pisses
some people off and something you just want to shout about it.
> There are a lot of much worse ways of saying that that would offend
> people, but I don't see this as one.
>
> But that could be just me :-) My vote is still to keep it, but I
> certainly understand that others can see it differently.
What this comes down to is this, how "correct" do we want to be?
Personally I feel the following words we can probably let slide:
Damn
Hell
Piss/es ;)
There are certainly much worse words we could be publishing.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your
> friend
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
